Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages

From: Mike Kravetz
Date: Thu Feb 18 2021 - 21:12:04 EST


On 2/18/21 4:00 AM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> alloc_contig_range will fail if it ever sees a HugeTLB page within the
> range we are trying to allocate, even when that page is free and can be
> easily reallocated.
> This has proofed to be problematic for some users of alloc_contic_range,
> e.g: CMA and virtio-mem, where those would fail the call even when those
> pages lay in ZONE_MOVABLE and are free.
>
> We can do better by trying to dissolve such pages.
>
> Free hugepages are tricky to handle so as to no userspace application
> notices disruption, we need to replace the current free hugepage with
> a new one.
>
> In order to do that, a new function called alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page
> is introduced.
> This function will first try to get a new fresh hugepage, and if it
> succeeds, it will dissolve the old one.
>
> If the old hugepage cannot be be dissolved, we have to dissolve the new
> hugepage we just got.
> Should that fail as well, we count is as a surplus, so the pool will be
> re-balanced when a hugepage gets free instead of enqueues again.
>
> With regard to the allocation, we restrict it to the node the page belongs
> to with __GFP_THISNODE, meaning we do not fallback on other node's zones.
>
> Note that gigantic hugetlb pages are fenced off since there is a cyclic
> dependency between them and alloc_contig_range.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 6 ++++
> mm/compaction.c | 12 ++++++++
> mm/hugetlb.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index b5807f23caf8..72352d718829 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -505,6 +505,7 @@ struct huge_bootmem_page {
> struct hstate *hstate;
> };
>
> +bool isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page);
> struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, int avoid_reserve);
> struct page *alloc_huge_page_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
> @@ -775,6 +776,11 @@ void set_page_huge_active(struct page *page);
> #else /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
> struct hstate {};
>
> +static inline bool isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static inline struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr,
> int avoid_reserve)
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 190ccdaa6c19..d52506ed9db7 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -905,6 +905,18 @@ isolate_migratepages_block(struct compact_control *cc, unsigned long low_pfn,
> valid_page = page;
> }
>
> + if (PageHuge(page) && cc->alloc_contig) {
> + if (!isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(page))
> + goto isolate_fail;
> +
> + /*
> + * Ok, the hugepage was dissolved. Now these pages are
> + * Buddy and cannot be re-allocated because they are
> + * isolated. Fall-through as the check below handles
> + * Buddy pages.
> + */
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Skip if free. We read page order here without zone lock
> * which is generally unsafe, but the race window is small and
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 4bdb58ab14cb..a4fbbe924a55 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -2294,6 +2294,81 @@ static void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h,
> }
> }
>
> +static bool alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(struct hstate *h, struct page *page)
> +{
> + gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
> + int nid = page_to_nid(page);
> + struct page *new_page;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + /*
> + * Before dissolving the page, we need to allocate a new one,
> + * so the pool remains stable.
> + */
> + new_page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL, NULL);
> + if (new_page) {
> + /*
> + * Free it into the hugepage allocator
> + */
> + put_page(new_page);
> +

Suppose an admin does

echo 0 > \
/sys/devices/system/node/node<nid>/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages

right now and dissolves both the original and new page.

> + /*
> + * Ok, we got a new free hugepage to replace this one. Try to
> + * dissolve the old page.
> + */
> + if (!dissolve_free_huge_page(page)) {
> + ret = true;

dissolve_free_huge_page will fail for the original page

> + } else if (dissolve_free_huge_page(new_page)) {

and, will fail for the new page

> + /*
> + * Seems the old page could not be dissolved, so try to
> + * dissolve the freshly allocated page. If that fails
> + * too, let us count the new page as a surplus. Doing so
> + * allows the pool to be re-balanced when pages are freed
> + * instead of enqueued again.
> + */
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + h->surplus_huge_pages++;
> + h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);

Those counts will be wrong as there are no huge pages on the node.

I'll think about this more tomorrow.
Pretty sure this is an issue, but I could be wrong. Just wanted to give
a heads up.
--
Mike Kravetz

> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +bool isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> + struct hstate *h = NULL;
> + struct page *head;
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> + if (PageHuge(page)) {
> + head = compound_head(page);
> + h = page_hstate(head);
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
> +
> + /*
> + * The page might have been dissolved from under our feet.
> + * If that is the case, return success as if we dissolved it ourselves.
> + */
> + if (!h)
> + return true;
> +
> + /*
> + * Fence off gigantic pages as there is a cyclic dependency
> + * between alloc_contig_range and them.
> + */
> + if (hstate_is_gigantic(h))
> + return ret;
> +
> + if(!page_count(head) && alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page(h, head))
> + ret = true;
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long addr, int avoid_reserve)
> {
>