[PATCH] btrfs: ref-verify: use 'inline void' keyword ordering

[Randy Dunlap]

Fix build warnings of function signature when CONFIG_STACKTRACE is not
enabled by reordering the 'inline' and 'void' keywords.

../fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:221:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
 static void inline __save_stack_trace(struct ref_action *ra)
../fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c:225:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
 static void inline __print_stack_trace(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,

Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Found in mmotm; applies to mainline.

Apparently we are doing more '-W' checking than when this change was
made in 2017.

 fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- mmotm-2021-0218-1829.orig/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
+++ mmotm-2021-0218-1829/fs/btrfs/ref-verify.c
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static void __print_stack_trace(struct b
 	stack_trace_print(ra->trace, ra->trace_len, 2);
 }
 #else
-static void inline __save_stack_trace(struct ref_action *ra)
+static inline void __save_stack_trace(struct ref_action *ra)
 {
 }
 
-static void inline __print_stack_trace(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+static inline void __print_stack_trace(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 				       struct ref_action *ra)
 {
 	btrfs_err(fs_info, "  ref-verify: no stacktrace support");