Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] docs: add documentation for checkpatch

From: Dwaipayan Ray
Date: Fri Feb 19 2021 - 13:35:22 EST


On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 11:25 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-02-17 at 22:24 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:
> > Add documentation for kernel script checkpatch.pl.
> > This documentation is also parsed by checkpatch to
> > enable a verbose mode.
> >
> > The checkpatch message types are grouped by usage. Under
> > each group the types are described briefly. 34 of such
> > types are documented.
>
> Of course with more to come as you are work on them... ;)
>

Yes sure I will be documenting all the types, albeit with a bit of time.

> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst
> []
> > + This applies for all non-functional blocks.
> > + However, there is one special case, namely functions: they have the
> > + opening brace at the beginning of the next line, thus::
> > +
> > + int function(int x)
> > + {
> > + body of function
> > + }
> > +
> > + Ref: `Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 3`
>
> Ideally, these Ref: entries should use a form with the specific section
> to jump to. For example:
>
> Ref: `https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces`
>
> Perhaps "See: " might be better than "Ref: "
>
> See: `https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#placing-braces-and-spaces`
>
> > + **CODE_INDENT**
> > + Code indent should use tabs instead of spaces.
> > + Outside of comments, documentation and Kconfig,
> > + spaces are never used for indentation.
> > + Ref: `Documentation/process/coding-style.rst section 1`
>
> See: `https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#indentation`
>
> etc...
>
>

Okay, I will convert the references.
Thanks for the review!

With regards,
Dwaipayan.