Re: [PATCH v2 19/25] tty: serial: samsung_tty: IRQ rework

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:53:10PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote:
> > Separate patch for trivial renaming.
> 
> I think it makes sense to do this rename together with the first change
> above, as it keeps both functions symmetric. Otherwise we end up with an
> inconsistent function naming between both patches. If you really want it
> separate though, I can do that.

OK, keep your version.

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hector Martin <marcan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++-------------
> > >   1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > > index 21955be680a4..821cd0e4f870 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung_tty.c
> > > @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ struct s3c24xx_uart_port {
> > >   #endif
> > >   };
> > > +static void s3c24xx_serial_start_next_tx(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport);
> > > +static void s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport);
> > > +
> > >   /* conversion functions */
> > >   #define s3c24xx_dev_to_port(__dev) dev_get_drvdata(__dev)
> > > @@ -316,8 +319,6 @@ static void s3c24xx_serial_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> > >   	ourport->tx_mode = 0;
> > >   }
> > > -static void s3c24xx_serial_start_next_tx(struct s3c24xx_uart_port *ourport);
> > > -
> > 
> > Why moving this? Why adding s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars() forward
> > declaration?
> 
> This should've gone in the next patch. A previous reviewer told me to put
> declarations at the top of the file, so I put it there and moved this one
> along with it, but I'll keep it to the additon only for v3.

Maybe I missed something in the context but it looked like
forward declaration s3c24xx_serial_tx_chars() was not needed? In such
case no need to move it.

Best regards,
Krzysztof