RE: RE: [PATCH v22 2/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read

From: Daejun Park
Date: Tue Feb 23 2021 - 03:02:38 EST


> +/*
> > + * This function will parse recommended active subregion information in
> > sense
> > + * data field of response UPIU with SAM_STAT_GOOD state.
> > + */
> > +void ufshpb_rsp_upiu(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> > +{
> > + struct ufshpb_lu *hpb;
> > + struct scsi_device *sdev;
> > + struct utp_hpb_rsp *rsp_field = &lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->hr;
> > + int data_seg_len;
> > + bool found = false;
> > +
> > + __shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
> > + hpb = ufshpb_get_hpb_data(sdev);
> > +
> > + if (!hpb)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (rsp_field->lun == hpb->lun) {
> > + found = true;
> > + break;
> This piece of code looks awkward, although it is probably working.
> Why not just having a reference to the hpb luns, e.g. something like:
> struct ufshpb_lu *hpb_luns[8] in struct ufs_hba.
> Less elegant - but much more effective than iterating the scsi host on every completion interrupt.

OK,

> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if ((ufshpb_get_state(hpb) != HPB_PRESENT) &&
> > + (ufshpb_get_state(hpb) != HPB_SUSPEND)) {
> > + dev_notice(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
> > + "%s: ufshpb state is not PRESENT/SUSPEND\n",
> > + __func__);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data_seg_len = be32_to_cpu(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2)
> > + & MASK_RSP_UPIU_DATA_SEG_LEN;
> > +
> > + /* To flush remained rsp_list, we queue the map_work task */
> > + if (!data_seg_len) {
> data_seg_len should be 0x14

It is checking non-HPB hint UPIU. It is used for kicking map work.

> > + if (!ufshpb_is_general_lun(hpb->lun))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ufshpb_kick_map_work(hpb);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check HPB_UPDATE_ALERT */
> > + if (!(lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->header.dword_2 &
> > + UPIU_HEADER_DWORD(0, 2, 0, 0)))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct utp_hpb_rsp) != UTP_HPB_RSP_SIZE);
> > +
> > + if (!ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid(hba, lrbp, rsp_field))
> > + return;
> How about moving both the data_seg_len and alert bit checks into ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid,
> And moving ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid to the beginning of the function?
> This way you would save redundant stuff if not a valid response.

I will move alert bit check into ufshpb_is_hpb_rsp_valid.

Thanks,
Daejun