Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: usb: generic-ehci: document ignore-oc flag
From: Álvaro Fernández Rojas
Date: Tue Feb 23 2021 - 11:06:13 EST
Hi Alan,
> El 23 feb 2021, a las 16:54, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:50:04PM +0100, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Over-current reporting isn't supported on some platforms such as bcm63xx.
>> These devices will incorrectly report over-current if this flag isn't properly
>> activated.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml | 5 +++++
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> index cf83f2d9afac..294bbf02399e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic-ehci.yaml
>> @@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ properties:
>> Set this flag if EHCI has a Transaction Translator built into
>> the root hub.
>>
>> + ignore-oc:
>> + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>> + description:
>> + Set this flag for HCDs without over-current reporting support.
>
> This is not a good description of a device property. DT entries are
> supposed to described the hardware, not talk about how to use it.
Any suggestions on a proper description?
>
> When you say that the bcm63xx doesn't support over-current reporting,
> what exactly do you mean? Do you mean that sometimes the hardware turns
> on the over-current bit when an over-current isn't actually present? Or
> do you mean something else?
Yes, the hardware turns on the over-current bit with no over-current present.
>
> Alan Stern
>
>> +
>> needs-reset-on-resume:
>> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
>> description:
>> --
>> 2.20.1
Best regards,
Álvaro.