Re: [PATCH] hugetlb: fix uninitialized subpool pointer

[Oscar Salvador]

On 2021-02-23 23:55, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> Yes, that is the more common case where the once active hugetlb page
> will be simply added to the free list via enqueue_huge_page().  This
> path does not go through prep_new_huge_page.

Right, I see.

Thanks

--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3