Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()

From: Quentin Perret
Date: Thu Feb 25 2021 - 03:54:43 EST

Next message: Yang Li: "[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: add missing call to of_node_put()"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "Re: [PATCH] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory"
In reply to: vincent . donnefort: "[PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()"
Next in thread: Dietmar Eggemann: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thursday 25 Feb 2021 at 08:36:12 (+0000), vincent.donnefort@xxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@xxxxxxx>
>
> The sub_positive local version is saving an explicit load-store and is
> enough for the cpu_util_next() usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@xxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Quentin

Next message: Yang Li: "[PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: add missing call to of_node_put()"
Previous message: Mike Rapoport: "Re: [PATCH] mm, kasan: don't poison boot memory"
In reply to: vincent . donnefort: "[PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()"
Next in thread: Dietmar Eggemann: "Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]