Re: synchronization model: was: Re: [PATCH printk-rework 09/14] printk: introduce a kmsg_dump iterator

[John Ogness]

On 2021-02-25, Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMHO, a better design would be:
>
> 1. dumper->dump() callback should have only one parameter @reason.
>    The callback should define its own iterator, buffer, and
>    do the dump.

Unfortunately this won't work because drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c is using the
dumper parameter for container_of().

So we will need 2 parameters: dumper and reason.

Can we agree to proceed with 2 parameters in the callback?

> 2. dumpe->dump() callback should synchronize the entire operation
>    using its own locks. Only the callback knows whether it is
>    safe to do more dumps in parallel. Only the callback knows
>    whether it is called only during panic() when no locks
>    are needed.

Agreed. I implemented this part for the v3 series.

John Ogness