Re: [PATCH v1 01/12] gna: add driver module

[Maciej Kwapulinski]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 05:05:14PM +0100, Maciej Kwapulinski wrote:
....
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/gna/gna_driver.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>> +/* Copyright(c) 2017-2021 Intel Corporation */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __GNA_DRIVER_H__
>> +#define __GNA_DRIVER_H__
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +#define GNA_DRV_NAME	"gna"
>
> Way too generic, no one knows what "gna" is.
>

"intel gna" is much more verbose in search engines.
As we do not (plan to) have more "gna" drivers, is the following ok?:

intel-gna

the change would imply the following:

prompt$ lspci -s 00:00.3 -vvvv
00:00.3 System peripheral: Intel Corporation Device 3190 (rev 03)
	Subsystem: Intel Corporation Device 2072
  ....
	Kernel driver in use: intel-gna
	Kernel modules: gna

is it ok?

also, how about the interface to library (it's part of one of next patches)?:
prompt$ file /dev/gna0
/dev/gna0: character special (235/0)

can "gna" stay intact here?

I'm pointing this out, because gna exists on the market for a while and
changing the above may have some impact we'd like to avoid.

>
....