On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 15:10, Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
dev_err_probe(). Less code and the error value gets printed.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 20 ++++++--------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
index 027769e39f9b..35b3542f1f7b 100644
--- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
@@ -324,22 +324,14 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
mutex_init(&data->lock);
data->vdd_center = devm_regulator_get(dev, "center");
- if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
- dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
- return PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center);
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center),
+ "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
data->dmc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "dmc_clk");
- if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk)) {
- if (PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
- return -EPROBE_DEFER;
-
- dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
- return PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk);
- }
+ if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk))
+ return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk),
+ "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
data->edev = devfreq_event_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, 0);
if (IS_ERR(data->edev))
--
2.17.1
Applied it. Thanks.
Hi Chanwoo,
Do you know what happened with this patch? You replied that it is
applied but I cannot find it in the Linus' or next trees.