Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] irqdomain: Introduce irq_domain_create_simple() API
From: Marc Zyngier
Date: Thu Mar 04 2021 - 13:31:08 EST
Andy,
On Thu, 04 Mar 2021 15:02:11 +0000,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Linus Walleij pointed out that ird_domain_add_simple() gained
> additional functionality and can't be anymore replaced with
> a simple conditional. In preparation to upgrade GPIO library
> to use fwnode, introduce irq_domain_create_simple() API which is
> functional equivalent to the existing irq_domain_add_simple(),
> but takes a pointer to the struct fwnode_handle as a parameter.
>
> While at it, amend documentation to mention irq_domain_create_*()
> functions where it makes sense.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 42d196805f58..1d4a8e7c5d5f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -265,6 +265,11 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_domain_add_simple(struct device_node *of_node,
> unsigned int first_irq,
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops,
> void *host_data);
> +struct irq_domain *irq_domain_create_simple(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + unsigned int size,
> + unsigned int first_irq,
> + const struct irq_domain_ops *ops,
> + void *host_data);
> struct irq_domain *irq_domain_add_legacy(struct device_node *of_node,
> unsigned int size,
> unsigned int first_irq,
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index 288151393a06..418548ea13cf 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -317,10 +317,20 @@ struct irq_domain *irq_domain_add_simple(struct device_node *of_node,
> unsigned int first_irq,
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops,
> void *host_data)
> +{
> + return irq_domain_create_simple(of_node_to_fwnode(of_node), size, first_irq, ops, host_data);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_domain_add_simple);
Please move this as an inline helper in linux/irqdomain.h, so that we
can drop this export altogether.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.