Re: [PATCH 4/4] KVM: x86/mmu: Factor out tdp_iter_return_to_root

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 12/03/21 17:35, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> What about calling it tdp_iter_restart()?  Or tdp_iter_resume()?  Or something
> like tdp_iter_restart_at_next() if we want it to give a hint that the next_last
> thing is where it restarts.
>
> I think I like tdp_iter_restart() the best.  It'd be easy enough to add a
> function comment clarifying from where it restarts, and IMO the resulting code
> in tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched() is the most intutive, e.g. it makes it very clear
> that the walk is being restarted in some capacity after yielding.

I agree with tdp_iter_restart(), or tdp_iter_restart_from_root() too.

Paolo