Re: [PATCH 1/6] mm/huge_memory.c: rework the function vma_adjust_trans_huge()
From: Miaohe Lin
Date: Sun Mar 14 2021 - 22:05:14 EST
Hi:
On 2021/3/14 4:03, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 05:32:19AM -0500, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> +static inline void try_to_split_huge_pmd_address(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
>> +{
>> + if (address & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK &&
>> + range_in_vma(vma, address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK,
>> + (address & HPAGE_PMD_MASK) + HPAGE_PMD_SIZE))
>> + split_huge_pmd_address(vma, address, false, NULL);
>> +}
>
> This isn't "try to split". This is "split if needed". I think the
> comments also need to be moved up here.
>
Make sense. Would do it in v2! Thanks!
> I'm not even sure this is really an improvement.
> .
>
At least we can eliminate a couple of duplicated lines and use helper range_in_vma() to improve
the readability slightly. Right? :)