Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mm: fs: Invalidate BH LRU during page migration

[Minchan Kim]

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 09:17:23AM -0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 10:33:48AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 12.03.21 10:03, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 10.03.21 17:14, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > > ffer_head LRU caches will be pinned and thus cannot be migrated.
> > > > This can prevent CMA allocations from succeeding, which are often used
> > > > on platforms with co-processors (such as a DSP) that can only use
> > > > physically contiguous memory. It can also prevent memory
> > > > hot-unplugging from succeeding, which involves migrating at least
> > > > MIN_MEMORY_BLOCK_SIZE bytes of memory, which ranges from 8 MiB to 1
> > > > GiB based on the architecture in use.
> > > 
> > > Actually, it's memory_block_size_bytes(), which can be even bigger
> > > (IIRC, 128MiB..2 GiB on x86-64) that fails to get offlined. But that
> > > will prevent bigger granularity (e.g., a whole DIMM) from getting unplugged.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Correspondingly, invalidate the BH LRU caches before a migration
> > > > starts and stop any buffer_head from being cached in the LRU caches,
> > > > until migration has finished.
> > > 
> > > Sounds sane to me.
> > > 
> > 
> > Diving a bit into the code, I am wondering:
> > 
> > 
> > a) Are these buffer head pages marked as movable?
> > 
> > IOW, are they either PageLRU() or __PageMovable()?
> > 
> > 
> > b) How do these pages end up on ZONE_MOVABLE or MIGRATE_CMA?
> > 
> > I assume these pages come via
> > alloc_page_buffers()->alloc_buffer_head()->kmem_cache_zalloc(GFP_NOFS |
> > __GFP_ACCOUNT)
> > 
> 
> It's indirect it was not clear
> 
> try_to_release_page
>     try_to_free_buffers
>         buffer_busy
>             failed
> 
> Yeah, comment is misleading. This one would be better.
> 
>         /*
>          * the refcount of buffer_head in bh_lru prevents dropping the
>          * attached page(i.e., try_to_free_buffers) so it could cause
>          * failing page migrationn.
>          * Skip putting upcoming bh into bh_lru until migration is done.
>          */

Hi Andrew,

Could you fold this comment fix patch? If you prefer formal patch,
let me know. I will resend it.

Thank you.