Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sched: remove unnecessay lock protection for skb_bad_txq/gso_skb

[Yunsheng Lin]

On 2021/3/17 5:45, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 10:40:56 +0800
> 
>> On 2021/3/16 7:41, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> At least for the fast path, taking two locks for lockless qdisc hurts
>> performance when handling requeued skb, especially if the lockless
>> qdisc supports TCQ_F_CAN_BYPASS.
> 
> The bad txq and gro skb cases are not "fast path", sorry

You are right, it is more of exceptional data path, but it is still
ok to clean that up without obvious risk, right?
For I am going to replace qdisc->seqlock with qdisc_lock(q) for lockless
qdisc too and remove qdisc->seqlock, which makes more sense.


> 
> .
>