Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo

[Zack Rusin]

> On Mar 20, 2021, at 17:16, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> s/particuar/particular/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
>  * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
>  * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
>  * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
>  * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
>  * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
> 

Looks good. I’ll push it through the drm-misc tree on my next series. Unless of course you want to push it through a different tree in which case:
Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin <zackr@xxxxxxxxxx>

z