Re: [PATCH] amdgpu: fix gcc -Wrestrict warning

From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Wed Mar 24 2021 - 09:34:49 EST


On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 4:57 PM Rasmus Villemoes
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 23/03/2021 14.04, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > if (securedisplay_cmd->status == TA_SECUREDISPLAY_STATUS__SUCCESS) {
> > + int pos = 0;
> > memset(i2c_output, 0, sizeof(i2c_output));
> > for (i = 0; i < TA_SECUREDISPLAY_I2C_BUFFER_SIZE; i++)
> > - sprintf(i2c_output, "%s 0x%X", i2c_output,
> > + pos += sprintf(i2c_output + pos, " 0x%X",
> > securedisplay_cmd->securedisplay_out_message.send_roi_crc.i2c_buf[i]);
> > dev_info(adev->dev, "SECUREDISPLAY: I2C buffer out put is :%s\n", i2c_output);
>
> Eh, why not get rid of the 256 byte stack allocation and just replace
> all of this by
>
> dev_info(adev->dev, ""SECUREDISPLAY: I2C buffer out put is: %*ph\n",
> TA_SECUREDISPLAY_I2C_BUFFER_SIZE,
> securedisplay_cmd->securedisplay_out_message.send_roi_crc.i2c_buf);
>
> That's much less code (both in #LOC and .text), and avoids adding yet
> another place that will be audited over and over for "hm, yeah, that
> sprintf() is actually not gonna overflow".
>
> Yeah, it'll lose the 0x prefixes for each byte and use lowercase hex chars.

Ah, I didn't know the kernel's sprintf could do that, that's really nice.

I'll send a follow-up patch, as Alex has already applied the first one.

Alex, feel free to merge the two into one, or just keep as they are.

Arnd