Re: [V2][PATCH] cpufreq: dt: check the -EPROBE_DEFER error returned by dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table

[Viresh Kumar]

On 25-03-21, 14:42, quanyang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Made some changes and applied this:

Author: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Mar 25 14:42:08 2021 +0800

    cpufreq: dt: dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() may return -EPROBE_DEFER
    
    The function dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table() may return -EPROBE_DEFER,
    which needs to be propagated to the caller to try probing the driver
    later on.
    
    Signed-off-by: Quanyang Wang <quanyang.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    [ Viresh: Massage changelog/subject, improve code. ]
    Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index b1e1bdc63b01..ece52863ba62 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -255,10 +255,15 @@ static int dt_cpufreq_early_init(struct device *dev, int cpu)
         * before updating priv->cpus. Otherwise, we will end up creating
         * duplicate OPPs for the CPUs.
         *
-        * OPPs might be populated at runtime, don't check for error here.
+        * OPPs might be populated at runtime, don't fail for error here unless
+        * it is -EPROBE_DEFER.
         */
-       if (!dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(priv->cpus))
+       ret = dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(priv->cpus);
+       if (!ret) {
                priv->have_static_opps = true;
+       } else if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
+               goto out;
+       }
 
        /*
         * The OPP table must be initialized, statically or dynamically, by this

-- 
viresh