Re: [PATCH v2] IB/mlx5: Reduce max order of memory allocated for xlt update

[Jason Gunthorpe]

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 09:27:38PM -0700, Aruna Ramakrishna wrote:

> > Do you have benchmarks that show the performance of the high order
> > pages is not relavent? I'm a bit surprised to hear that
> > 
> 
> I guess my point was more to the effect that an order-8 alloc will
> fail more often than not, in this flow. For instance, when we were
> debugging the latency spikes here, this was the typical buddyinfo
> output on that system:
> 
> Node 0, zone      DMA      0      1      1      2      3      0      1      0      1      1      3 
> Node 0, zone    DMA32      7      7      7      6     10      2      6      7      6      2    306 
> Node 0, zone   Normal   3390  51354  17574   6556   1586     26      2      1      0      0      0 
> Node 1, zone   Normal  11519  23315  23306   9738     73      2      0      1      0      0      0 
> 
> I think this level of fragmentation is pretty normal on long running
> systems. Here, in the reg_mr flow, the first try (order-8) alloc
> will probably fail 9 times out of 10 (esp. after the addition of
> GFP_NORETRY flag), and then as fallback, the code tries to allocate
> a lower order, and if that too fails, it allocates a page. I think
> it makes sense to just avoid trying an order-8 alloc here.

But a system like this won't get THPs either, so I'm not sure it is
relevant. The function was designed as it is to consume a "THP" if it
is available.

Jason