Re: [RFC][PATCH] task_struct::state frobbing

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Mar 25 2021 - 15:52:05 EST


On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 19:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
> int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
> {
> struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> - long state;
> + unsigned int state;
>
> if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
> !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
> @@ -3891,7 +3891,7 @@ int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>
> hctx->poll_considered++;
>
> - state = current->state;
> + state = READ_ONCE(current->__state);

Can we please have get_current_state() for that?

> static bool io_wq_worker_affinity(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
> {
> - struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
> - struct rq_flags rf;
> - struct rq *rq;
> -
> - rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
> - do_set_cpus_allowed(task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
> - task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
> - task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));

Duh, I thought we got all of them by now.

Thanks,

tglx