[PATCH V2] ipc/sem.c: Mundane typo fixes

[Bhaskar Chowdhury]

s/runtine/runtime/
s/AQUIRE/ACQUIRE/
s/seperately/separately/
s/wont/won\'t/
s/succesfull/successful/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 Changes from V1:
  Wrongly spelt filename in the subject line, corrected.

 ipc/sem.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..0897dac27f43 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
  * - two Linux specific semctl() commands: SEM_STAT, SEM_INFO.
  * - undo adjustments at process exit are limited to 0..SEMVMX.
  * - namespace are supported.
- * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtine by writing
+ * - SEMMSL, SEMMNS, SEMOPM and SEMMNI can be configured at runtime by writing
  *   to /proc/sys/kernel/sem.
  * - statistics about the usage are reported in /proc/sysvipc/sem.
  *
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static int sysvipc_sem_proc_show(struct seq_file *s, void *it);
  * Setting it to a result code is a RELEASE, this is ensured by both a
  * smp_store_release() (for case a) and while holding sem_lock()
  * (for case b).
- * The AQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
+ * The ACQUIRE when reading the result code without holding sem_lock() is
  * achieved by using READ_ONCE() + smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep().
  * (case a above).
  * Reading the result code while holding sem_lock() needs no further barriers,
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)

 	/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
 	 * - complex operations always restart.
-	 * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+	 * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
 	 * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
 	 *   altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
 	 *   simple increments never sleep.
@@ -1046,7 +1046,7 @@ static void do_smart_update(struct sem_array *sma, struct sembuf *sops, int nsop
 			 * - No complex ops, thus all sleeping ops are
 			 *   decrease.
 			 * - if we decreased the value, then any sleeping
-			 *   semaphore ops wont be able to run: If the
+			 *   semaphore ops won't be able to run: If the
 			 *   previous value was too small, then the new
 			 *   value will be too small, too.
 			 */
@@ -2108,7 +2108,7 @@ static long do_semtimedop(int semid, struct sembuf __user *tsops,
 	queue.dupsop = dupsop;

 	error = perform_atomic_semop(sma, &queue);
-	if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking succesfull path */
+	if (error == 0) { /* non-blocking successful path */
 		DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);

 		/*
--
2.26.2