Re: [PATCH] media: sq905.c: fix uninitialized variable

[Dmitry Vyukov]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:24 AM Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2021-03-26 at 08:14 +0100, 'Dmitry Vyukov' via syzkaller wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 8:11 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 11:22:02PM +0200, Alaa Emad wrote:
> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+a4e309017a5f3a24c7b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alaa Emad <alaaemadhossney.ae@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > >
> > > I know I do not take patches with no changelog text, but other
> > > maintainers might be more leniant :(
> >
> > I wonder if it's the right fix or not.
> > Initializing variables will, of course, silence the warning, but it's
> > not necessarily the right fix. I suspect there is something wrong in
> > how ret/act_len are user/checked.
> >
>
> There is a problem in usb_bulk_msg() call. It could return before
> act_len initialization, so i think, act_len should be intialized with
> smth wrong like 0 or -1. BTW, I already send patch for that, but it was
> marked as obsoleted.

If usb_bulk_msg returns before act_len initialization, it should
signify that fact with an error code in return value or something,
right? It does not initialize act_len only in case of errors, right?
If so, sq905_read_data must check ret and don't use act_for any
checks. But it does, and that's I think the bug. Or maybe usb_bulk_msg
does not properly signify that it failed (and did not initialize
act_len). Either way silencing the warning with pre-initializing
act_len looks very fishy.
For example, consider, in some contexts it's OK to transmit 0-length
packets, I don't know if it's the case for usb_bulk_msg or not, but it
does not affect the idea. Now, if we pre-initialize act_len to 0, we
can falsely think that such 0-length transfer has succeeded (act_len
== size), while it actually failed (I assume so since usb_bulk_msg
left act_len unitialized).