Re: [PATCH v3 19/19] media: i2c: rdacm20: Re-work ov10635 reset

[Jacopo Mondi]

Hi Laurent,

On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 06:24:09PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 05:41:48PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > The OV10635 image sensor embedded in the camera module is currently
> > reset after the MAX9271 initialization with two long delays that were
> > most probably not correctly characterized.
> >
> > Re-work the image sensor reset procedure by holding the chip in reset
> > during the MAX9271 configuration, removing the long sleep delays and
> > only wait after the chip exits from reset for 350-500 microseconds
> > interval, which is larger than the minimum (2048 * (1 / XVCLK)) timeout
> > characterized in the chip manual.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > index 7ed3866b5335..7ba2d0249da8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > @@ -454,6 +454,19 @@ static int rdacm20_init(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int val)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Hold OV10635 in reset during max9271 configuration. The reset signal
> > +	 * has to be asserted for at least 200 microseconds.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = max9271_enable_gpios(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_GPIO1OUT);
> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	ret = max9271_clear_gpios(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_GPIO1OUT);
>
> enable and clear is very cnonfusing. How about mimicking the GPIO API,
> with direction_input(), direction_output() and set_value() functions ?
> It would also be nice if the polarity could be handled in a nicer way.
> There's no GPIO request API here, but maybe a max9271_gpio_set_flags() ?
>

Probably, that's an unrelated rework that could go on top unrelated to
this patch

> > +	if (ret)
> > +		return ret;
> > +	usleep_range(200, 500);
> > +
> >  	ret = max9271_configure_gmsl_link(&dev->serializer);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > @@ -468,22 +481,14 @@ static int rdacm20_init(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, unsigned int val)
> >  	dev->serializer.client->addr = dev->addrs[0];
> >
> >  	/*
> > -	 * Reset the sensor by cycling the OV10635 reset signal connected to the
> > -	 * MAX9271 GPIO1 and verify communication with the OV10635.
> > +	 * Release ov10635 from reset and initialize it. The image sensor
> > +	 * requires at least 2048 XVCLK cycles (85 micro-seconds at 24MHz)
> > +	 * before being available. Stay safe and wait up to 500 micro-seconds.
> >  	 */
> > -	ret = max9271_enable_gpios(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_GPIO1OUT);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > -
> > -	ret = max9271_clear_gpios(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_GPIO1OUT);
> > -	if (ret)
> > -		return ret;
> > -	usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> > -
> >  	ret = max9271_set_gpios(&dev->serializer, MAX9271_GPIO1OUT);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> > -	usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> > +	usleep_range(100, 500);
> >
> >  	for (i = 0; i < OV10635_PID_TIMEOUT; ++i) {
> >  		ret = ov10635_read16(dev, OV10635_PID);
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart