Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane

From: Simon Ser
Date: Sat Mar 27 2021 - 07:24:27 EST

Next message: Paul Cercueil: "Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Previous message: Hans Verkuil: "Re: [PATCH v9 16/22] media: uvcvideo: Return -EACCES to inactive controls"
In reply to: Paul Cercueil: "[PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Next in thread: Paul Cercueil: "Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Saturday, March 27th, 2021 at 12:22 PM, Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The ingenic-drm driver has two mutually exclusive primary planes
> already; so the fact that a CRTC must have one and only one primary
> plane is an invalid assumption.

Why does this driver expose two primary planes, if it only has a single
CRTC?

Next message: Paul Cercueil: "Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Previous message: Hans Verkuil: "Re: [PATCH v9 16/22] media: uvcvideo: Return -EACCES to inactive controls"
In reply to: Paul Cercueil: "[PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Next in thread: Paul Cercueil: "Re: [PATCH] drm: DON'T require each CRTC to have a unique primary plane"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]