Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: xilinx: Utilize generic bitmap_get_value and _set_value
From: William Breathitt Gray
Date: Sat Mar 27 2021 - 08:02:22 EST
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 09:29:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Saturday, March 27, 2021, Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 11:32 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:08 PM Syed Nayyar Waris <syednwaris@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[0], 32, 0);
> > > > + bitmap_set_value(old, 64, state[1], 32, 32);
> > >
> > > Isn't it effectively bitnap_from_arr32() ?
> > >
> > > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[0], 32, 0);
> > > > + bitmap_set_value(new, 64, state[1], 32, 32);
> > >
> > > Ditto.
> > >
> > > --
> > > With Best Regards,
> > > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > With bitmap_set_value() we are also specifying the offset (or start)
> > position too. so that the remainder of the array remains unaffected. I
> > think it would not be feasible to use bitmap_from/to_arr32() here.
>
>
> You have hard coded start and nbits parameters to 32. How is it not the
> same?
Would these four lines become something like this:
bitmap_from_arr32(old, state, 64);
...
bitmap_from_arr32(new, state, 64);
Sincerely,
William Breathitt Gray
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature