[PATCH 5.11 223/254] bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Mon Mar 29 2021 - 05:04:49 EST


From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit b9082970478009b778aa9b22d5561eef35b53b63 ]

__bpf_arch_text_poke does rewrite only for atomic nop5, emit_nops(xxx, 5)
emits non-atomic one which breaks fentry/fexit with k8 atomics:

P6_NOP5 == P6_NOP5_ATOMIC (0f1f440000 == 0f1f440000)
K8_NOP5 != K8_NOP5_ATOMIC (6666906690 != 6666666690)

Can be reproduced by doing "ideal_nops = k8_nops" in "arch_init_ideal_nops()
and running fexit_bpf2bpf selftest.

Fixes: e21aa341785c ("bpf: Fix fexit trampoline.")
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210320000001.915366-1-sdf@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 652bd64e422d..023ac12f54a2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1811,7 +1811,8 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
im->ip_after_call = prog;
- emit_nops(&prog, 5);
+ memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
+ prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
}

if (fmod_ret->nr_progs) {
--
2.30.1