Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] s390/cio: use DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD() for wait_queue

[Vineeth Vijayan]

For both the patches,

Acked-by: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I will correct the description, and Heiko/Vasily will pick this up and 
will be part of the s390-tree patchset.

On 3/29/21 11:40 AM, Shixin Liu wrote:
> wait_queue_head_t can be initialized automatically with DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD()
> rather than explicitly calling init_waitqueue_head().

A minor checkpatch WARNING. I will modify this.

> Signed-off-by: Shixin Liu <liushixin2@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/s390/cio/css.c | 3 +--
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> index f01ef6325039..a974943c27da 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/cio/css.c
> @@ -652,13 +652,12 @@ static void css_sch_todo(struct work_struct *work)
>   
>   static struct idset *slow_subchannel_set;
>   static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(slow_subchannel_lock);
> -static wait_queue_head_t css_eval_wq;
> +static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(css_eval_wq);
>   static atomic_t css_eval_scheduled;
>   
>   static int __init slow_subchannel_init(void)
>   {
>   	atomic_set(&css_eval_scheduled, 0);
> -	init_waitqueue_head(&css_eval_wq);
>   	slow_subchannel_set = idset_sch_new();
>   	if (!slow_subchannel_set) {
>   		CIO_MSG_EVENT(0, "could not allocate slow subchannel set\n");