[PATCH 1/1] of: base: Fix spelling issue with function param 'prop'
From: Lee Jones
Date: Mon Mar 29 2021 - 11:25:38 EST
Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
drivers/of/base.c:1781: warning: Function parameter or member 'prop' not described in '__of_add_property'
drivers/of/base.c:1781: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob' description in '__of_add_property'
drivers/of/base.c:1804: warning: Function parameter or member 'prop' not described in 'of_add_property'
drivers/of/base.c:1804: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob' description in 'of_add_property'
drivers/of/base.c:1855: warning: Function parameter or member 'prop' not described in 'of_remove_property'
drivers/of/base.c:1855: warning: Excess function parameter 'prob' description in 'of_remove_property'
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/of/base.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 457d1ec27300b..aaf52eaa8b8c7 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_count_phandle_with_args);
/**
* __of_add_property - Add a property to a node without lock operations
* @np: Caller's Device Node
- * @prob: Property to add
+ * @prop: Property to add
*/
int __of_add_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
{
@@ -1798,7 +1798,7 @@ int __of_add_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
/**
* of_add_property - Add a property to a node
* @np: Caller's Device Node
- * @prob: Property to add
+ * @prop: Property to add
*/
int of_add_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
{
@@ -1844,7 +1844,7 @@ int __of_remove_property(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
/**
* of_remove_property - Remove a property from a node.
* @np: Caller's Device Node
- * @prob: Property to remove
+ * @prop: Property to remove
*
* Note that we don't actually remove it, since we have given out
* who-knows-how-many pointers to the data using get-property.
--
2.27.0