Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix removal of valid error case when checking speed_bin

From: Akhil P Oommen
Date: Mon Mar 29 2021 - 23:37:06 EST


On 3/30/2021 7:04 AM, John Stultz wrote:
Commit 7bf168c8fe8c ("drm/msm: Fix speed-bin support not to
access outside valid memory"), reworked the nvmem reading of
"speed_bin", but in doing so dropped handling of the -ENOENT
case which was previously documented as "fine".

That change resulted in the db845c board display to fail to
start, with the following error:

adreno 5000000.gpu: [drm:a6xx_gpu_init] *ERROR* failed to read speed-bin (-2). Some OPPs may not be supported by hardware

Thus, this patch simply re-adds the ENOENT handling so the lack
of the speed_bin entry isn't fatal for display, and gets things
working on db845c.

Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: freedreno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: YongQin Liu <yongqin.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 7bf168c8fe8c ("drm/msm: Fix speed-bin support not to access outside valid memory")
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
index 690409ca8a186..cb2df8736ca85 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c
@@ -1406,7 +1406,13 @@ static int a6xx_set_supported_hw(struct device *dev, struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu,
int ret;
ret = nvmem_cell_read_u16(dev, "speed_bin", &speedbin);
- if (ret) {
+ /*
+ * -ENOENT means that the platform doesn't support speedbin which is
+ * fine
+ */
+ if (ret == -ENOENT) {
+ return 0;
+ } else if (ret) {
DRM_DEV_ERROR(dev,
"failed to read speed-bin (%d). Some OPPs may not be supported by hardware",
ret);


Reviewed-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This looks "fine" to me. ;)

-Akhil.