Re: [PATCH Resend v0 2/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8195: add binding document

[zhiyong tao]

On Tue, 2021-03-30 at 08:39 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 05:05:28PM +0800, zhiyong tao wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-03-29 at 14:21 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 19:30:59 +0800, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
> > > > The commit adds mt8195 compatible node in binding document.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.yaml      | 152 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 152 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.yaml
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
> > > 
> > > yamllint warnings/errors:
> > > 
> > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.example.dts:19:18: fatal error: dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8195-pinfunc.h: No such file or directory
> > >    19 |         #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/mt8195-pinfunc.h>
> > >       |                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > compilation terminated.
> > > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:349: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8195.example.dt.yaml] Error 1
> > > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> > > make: *** [Makefile:1380: dt_binding_check] Error 2
> > > 
> > > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1459558
> > > 
> > > This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
> > > series is generally the most recent rc1.
> > > 
> > > If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> > > error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> > > date:
> > > 
> > > pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
> > > 
> > > Please check and re-submit.
> > > 
> > 
> > ==> I set the patch file "mt8195-pinfunc.h" patch in "4/6". so we should
> > add the file "mt8195-pinfunc.h" in this patch ? or we should put it
> > before this patch(2/6)?
> 
> It is part of the binding, so it belongs in this patch.
> 
> Rob

==> Thanks for your suggestion. We will add it in this patch in next
version.