RE: [PATCH 5/5] i2c: designware: Switch over to i2c_freq_mode_string()

[Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)]

> No, please read the code carefully.
> We can duplicate conditional, but it brings a bit of inconsistency to how the counters are printed.

Thanks for clarification, I am still confused as the original
code print the real mode based on dev->master_cfg, the new
code is printing mode based on frequency.

My understanding is the original code could fall back to a lower
speed when higher speed modes were not set successfully. For
example, high speed mode falls back to fast mode:

if ((dev->master_cfg & DW_IC_CON_SPEED_MASK) ==
		DW_IC_CON_SPEED_HIGH) {
		if ((comp_param1 & DW_IC_COMP_PARAM_1_SPEED_MODE_MASK)
			!= DW_IC_COMP_PARAM_1_SPEED_MODE_HIGH) {
			dev_err(dev->dev, "High Speed not supported!\n");
			dev->master_cfg &= ~DW_IC_CON_SPEED_MASK;
			dev->master_cfg |= DW_IC_CON_SPEED_FAST;
			dev->hs_hcnt = 0;
			dev->hs_lcnt = 0;
		}

the original code was printing the mode based on the new
fallback dev->master_cfg but not the mode calculated from
frequency:

	switch (dev->master_cfg & DW_IC_CON_SPEED_MASK) {
	case DW_IC_CON_SPEED_STD:
		mode_str = "Standard Mode";
		break;
	case DW_IC_CON_SPEED_HIGH:
		mode_str = "High Speed Mode";
		break;
	default:
		mode_str = "Fast Mode";
	}

> > +     return 0;
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > --
> > 2.8.1
> 
> 
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko