Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: imx8mn: add spba bus node
From: Adam Ford
Date: Wed Mar 31 2021 - 14:25:00 EST
On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 8:34 PM Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: imx8mn: add spba bus node
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 06:26:41AM -0600, Adam Ford wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 6:15 AM <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > According to RM, there is a spba bus inside aips3 and aips1, add it.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi | 362
> > > > +++++++++++-----------
> > > > 1 file changed, 189 insertions(+), 173 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > > index c824f2615fe8..91f85b8cee9a 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm.dtsi
> > > > @@ -269,117 +269,125 @@ aips1: bus@30000000 {
> > > > #size-cells = <1>;
> > > > ranges = <0x30000000 0x30000000
> > 0x400000>;
> > > >
> > > > - sai1: sai@30010000 {
> > > > - #sound-dai-cells = <0>;
> > > > - compatible = "fsl,imx8mm-sai",
> > "fsl,imx8mq-sai";
> > > > - reg = <0x30010000 0x10000>;
> > > > - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 95
> > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > - clocks = <&clk
> > IMX8MM_CLK_SAI1_IPG>,
> > > > - <&clk
> > IMX8MM_CLK_SAI1_ROOT>,
> > > > - <&clk
> > IMX8MM_CLK_DUMMY>, <&clk IMX8MM_CLK_DUMMY>;
> > > > - clock-names = "bus", "mclk1",
> > "mclk2", "mclk3";
> > > > - dmas = <&sdma2 0 2 0>, <&sdma2
> > 1 2 0>;
> > > > - dma-names = "rx", "tx";
> > > > - status = "disabled";
> > > > - };
> > > > + bus@30000000 {
> > >
> > > There is already a bus@30000000 (aips1), and I think the system
> > > doesn't like it when there are multiple busses with the same name.
> > >
> > > There was some discussion on fixing the 8mn [1], but it doesn't look
> > > like it went anywhere.
> > >
> > > I am guessing the Mini will need something similar to the nano.
> > >
> > > [1] -
> > > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> > >
> > hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2Fpatch%2F1607324004-1
> > 29
> > >
> > 60-1-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang%40nxp.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7
> > Cpeng
> > > .fan%40nxp.com%7C970d320f3ef7413296ed08d8ac1486f9%7C686ea1d3bc
> > 2b4c6fa9
> > >
> > 2cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637448551481206715%7CUnknown%7CTW
> > FpbGZsb3d8ey
> > >
> > JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
> > %7C200
> > >
> > 0&sdata=xKgYHCDyitbUyTPKVuwQV%2FCoJvepCbdBJ1MD9vP%2B6MY
> > %3D&res
> > > erved=0
> >
> > Several replies from S.j. Wang are missing from LKML (and maybe
> > patchwork?) but we reached a conclusion:
>
> Thanks for the pointing, I'll give a look. If S.J take it, I'll leave it to S.J.
Peng or S.J,
I don't see this was ever finished. On the Nano, there is an spba-bus
under the aips1 bus, but I am not seeing anything on aips3 yet. It
appears to have been abandoned. The NXP kernel doesn't show either
spba-bus on the imx8m Mini either, but the documentation for the Mini
makes it look like it should work. Do you want me to submit a patch
for any of this?
adam
>
> Thanks,
> Peng.
>
> > https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flore.ke
> > rnel.org%2Flinux-arm-kernel%2F20201208090601.GA8347%40kozik-lap%2F&
> > amp;data=04%7C01%7Cpeng.fan%40nxp.com%7C970d320f3ef7413296ed08
> > d8ac1486f9%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C63744
> > 8551481206715%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiL
> > CJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000&sdata=nk
> > t0J5RtzA%2B29nK4aPnd434FNQV8MUZ%2F8Aq64o6hl6I%3D&reserved
> > =0
> >
> > Either you do some remapping of address space or just rename the "bus"
> > nodes (e.g. generic bus-1 or a specific spba-bus).
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof