Re: [PATCH] powerpc/vdso: Separate vvar vma from vdso

[Dmitry Safonov]

On 3/31/21 10:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[..]
>>
>>> @@ -133,7 +135,13 @@ static int __arch_setup_additional_pages(struct linux_binprm *bprm, int uses_int
>>>   	 * install_special_mapping or the perf counter mmap tracking code
>>>   	 * will fail to recognise it as a vDSO.
>>>   	 */
>>> -	mm->context.vdso = (void __user *)vdso_base + PAGE_SIZE;
>>> +	mm->context.vdso = (void __user *)vdso_base + vvar_size;
>>> +
>>> +	vma = _install_special_mapping(mm, vdso_base, vvar_size,
>>> +				       VM_READ | VM_MAYREAD | VM_IO |
>>> +				       VM_DONTDUMP | VM_PFNMAP, &vvar_spec);
>>> +	if (IS_ERR(vma))
>>> +		return PTR_ERR(vma);
>>>   
>>>   	/*
>>>   	 * our vma flags don't have VM_WRITE so by default, the process isn't
>>
>>
>> IIUC, VM_PFNMAP is for when we have a vvar_fault handler.
>> Allthough we will soon have one for handle TIME_NS, at the moment
>> powerpc doesn't have that handler.
>> Isn't it dangerous to set VM_PFNMAP then ?

I believe, it's fine, special_mapping_fault() does:
:		if (sm->fault)
:			return sm->fault(sm, vmf->vma, vmf);

> Some of the other flags seem odd too.
> eg. VM_IO ? VM_DONTDUMP ?

Yeah, so:
VM_PFNMAP | VM_IO is a protection from remote access on pages. So one
can't access such page with ptrace(), /proc/$pid/mem or
process_vm_write(). Otherwise, it would create COW mapping and the
tracee will stop working with stale vvar.

VM_DONTDUMP restricts the area from coredumping and gdb will also avoid
accessing those[1][2].

I agree that VM_PFNMAP was probably excessive in this patch alone and
rather synchronized code with other architectures, but it makes more
sense now in the new patches set by Christophe:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arch/cover.1617209141.git.christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx/


[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/550731AF.6080904@xxxxxxxxxx/T/
[2] https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/gdb-patches/2015-03/msg00383.html

Thanks,
          Dmitry