Re: [PATCH 3/3] USB: cdc-acm: fix TIOCGSERIAL implementation
From: Johan Hovold
Date: Thu Apr 08 2021 - 07:55:05 EST
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 01:34:12PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2021, 11:48 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 10:36:46AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 12:28 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold:
>
> > > Well, the devices report it. It is part of the standard.
> >
> > No, the standard doesn't include anything about a baud-base clock
> > AFAICT.
>
> Unfortunately it does.
> dwDTERate - chapter 6.3.11 - table 17
That's not the base clock rate, that's just the currently configured
line speed which you can read from termios.
> If we does this wrongly, we should certainly fix it, but just removing
> the reporting doesn't look right to me.
The driver got its interpretation of baud_base wrong, and CDC doesn't
even have a concept of base clock rate so removing it is the right thing
to do.
Again, baud_base is really only relevant with legacy UARTs and when
using the deprecated ASYNC_SPD_CUST.
And if the user wants to knows the current line speed we have a
different interface for that.
Johan