[tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Clean up active balance nr_balance_failed trickery
From: tip-bot2 for Valentin Schneider
Date: Fri Apr 09 2021 - 08:05:21 EST
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 03149668b42785918f362a88106094863db73b63
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/03149668b42785918f362a88106094863db73b63
Author: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:06:27 +01:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CommitterDate: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 13:53:12 +02:00
sched/fair: Clean up active balance nr_balance_failed trickery
When triggering an active load balance, sd->nr_balance_failed is set to
such a value that any further can_migrate_task() using said sd will ignore
the output of task_hot().
This behaviour makes sense, as active load balance intentionally preempts a
rq's running task to migrate it right away, but this asynchronous write is
a bit shoddy, as the stopper thread might run active_load_balance_cpu_stop
before the sd->nr_balance_failed write either becomes visible to the
stopper's CPU or even happens on the CPU that appended the stopper work.
Add a struct lb_env flag to denote active balancing, and use it in
can_migrate_task(). Remove the sd->nr_balance_failed write that served the
same purpose. Cleanup the LBF_DST_PINNED active balance special case.
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210407220628.3798191-3-valentin.schneider@xxxxxxx
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index d10e33d..3ed436e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7453,6 +7453,7 @@ enum migration_type {
#define LBF_NEED_BREAK 0x02
#define LBF_DST_PINNED 0x04
#define LBF_SOME_PINNED 0x08
+#define LBF_ACTIVE_LB 0x10
struct lb_env {
struct sched_domain *sd;
@@ -7614,10 +7615,13 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* our sched_group. We may want to revisit it if we couldn't
* meet load balance goals by pulling other tasks on src_cpu.
*
- * Avoid computing new_dst_cpu for NEWLY_IDLE or if we have
- * already computed one in current iteration.
+ * Avoid computing new_dst_cpu
+ * - for NEWLY_IDLE
+ * - if we have already computed one in current iteration
+ * - if it's an active balance
*/
- if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE || (env->flags & LBF_DST_PINNED))
+ if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE ||
+ env->flags & (LBF_DST_PINNED | LBF_ACTIVE_LB))
return 0;
/* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's CPUs: */
@@ -7642,10 +7646,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
/*
* Aggressive migration if:
- * 1) destination numa is preferred
- * 2) task is cache cold, or
- * 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
+ * 1) active balance
+ * 2) destination numa is preferred
+ * 3) task is cache cold, or
+ * 4) too many balance attempts have failed.
*/
+ if (env->flags & LBF_ACTIVE_LB)
+ return 1;
+
tsk_cache_hot = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
if (tsk_cache_hot == -1)
tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env);
@@ -9836,9 +9844,6 @@ more_balance:
active_load_balance_cpu_stop, busiest,
&busiest->active_balance_work);
}
-
- /* We've kicked active balancing, force task migration. */
- sd->nr_balance_failed = sd->cache_nice_tries+1;
}
} else {
sd->nr_balance_failed = 0;
@@ -9988,13 +9993,7 @@ static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data)
.src_cpu = busiest_rq->cpu,
.src_rq = busiest_rq,
.idle = CPU_IDLE,
- /*
- * can_migrate_task() doesn't need to compute new_dst_cpu
- * for active balancing. Since we have CPU_IDLE, but no
- * @dst_grpmask we need to make that test go away with lying
- * about DST_PINNED.
- */
- .flags = LBF_DST_PINNED,
+ .flags = LBF_ACTIVE_LB,
};
schedstat_inc(sd->alb_count);