Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] riscv: locks: Introduce ticket-based spinlock implementation

From: Guo Ren
Date: Sun Apr 11 2021 - 12:51:21 EST


On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 12:02 AM Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 10:32 PM <guoren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch introduces a ticket lock implementation for riscv, along the
> > same lines as the implementation for arch/arm & arch/csky.
> >
> > We still use qspinlock as default.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 7 ++-
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock_types.h | 17 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > index 67cc65ba1ea1..34d0276f01d5 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig
> > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ config RISCV
> > select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
> > select ARCH_WANT_HUGE_PMD_SHARE if 64BIT
> > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
> > - select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS
> > + select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS if !RISCV_TICKET_LOCK
> > select ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32
> > select CLONE_BACKWARDS
> > select CLINT_TIMER if !MMU
> > @@ -344,6 +344,11 @@ config NEED_PER_CPU_EMBED_FIRST_CHUNK
> > def_bool y
> > depends on NUMA
> >
> > +config RISCV_TICKET_LOCK
> > + bool "Ticket-based spin-locking"
> > + help
> > + Say Y here to use ticket-based spin-locking.
> > +
> > config RISCV_ISA_C
> > bool "Emit compressed instructions when building Linux"
> > default y
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > index a557de67a425..90b7eaa950cf 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,91 @@
> > #ifndef _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
> > #define _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_LOCK
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
> > +#define __ASM_SLLIW "slli\t"
> > +#define __ASM_SRLIW "srli\t"
> > +#else
> > +#define __ASM_SLLIW "slliw\t"
> > +#define __ASM_SRLIW "srliw\t"
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Ticket-based spin-locking.
> > + */
> > +static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > +{
> > + arch_spinlock_t lockval;
> > + u32 tmp;
> > +
> > + asm volatile (
> > + "1: lr.w %0, %2 \n"
> > + " mv %1, %0 \n"
> > + " addw %0, %0, %3 \n"
> > + " sc.w %0, %0, %2 \n"
> > + " bnez %0, 1b \n"
> > + : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (lockval), "+A" (lock->lock)
> > + : "r" (1 << TICKET_NEXT)
> > + : "memory");
> > +
> > + smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
> > + VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
> It's wrong, blew is fixup:
>
> diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
> index fe98ad8ece51..2be627ceb9df 100644
> --- a/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
> +++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/spinlock.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> : "r"(p), "r"(ticket_next)
> : "cc");
>
> - smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
> + if (lockval.owner != lockval.tickets.next)
> + smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
> VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
eh... plus __smp_acquire_fence:

if (lockval.owner != lockval.tickets.next)
smp_cond_load_acquire(&lock->tickets.owner,
VAL == lockval.tickets.next);
else
__smp_acquire_fence();

> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > +{
> > + u32 tmp, contended, res;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + asm volatile (
> > + " lr.w %0, %3 \n"
> > + __ASM_SRLIW "%1, %0, %5 \n"
> > + __ASM_SLLIW "%2, %0, %5 \n"
> > + " or %1, %2, %1 \n"
> > + " li %2, 0 \n"
> > + " sub %1, %1, %0 \n"
> > + " bnez %1, 1f \n"
> > + " addw %0, %0, %4 \n"
> > + " sc.w %2, %0, %3 \n"
> > + "1: \n"
> > + : "=&r" (tmp), "=&r" (contended), "=&r" (res),
> > + "+A" (lock->lock)
> > + : "r" (1 << TICKET_NEXT), "I" (TICKET_NEXT)
> > + : "memory");
> > + } while (res);
> > +
> > + if (!contended)
> > + __atomic_acquire_fence();
> > +
> > + return !contended;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > +{
> > + smp_store_release(&lock->tickets.owner, lock->tickets.owner + 1);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int arch_spin_value_unlocked(arch_spinlock_t lock)
> > +{
> > + return lock.tickets.owner == lock.tickets.next;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > +{
> > + return !arch_spin_value_unlocked(READ_ONCE(*lock));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int arch_spin_is_contended(arch_spinlock_t *lock)
> > +{
> > + struct __raw_tickets tickets = READ_ONCE(lock->tickets);
> > +
> > + return (tickets.next - tickets.owner) > 1;
> > +}
> > +#define arch_spin_is_contended arch_spin_is_contended
> > +#else /* CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_LOCK */
> > #include <asm/qspinlock.h>
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_LOCK */
> > +
> > #include <asm/qrwlock.h>
> >
> > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_H */
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock_types.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> > index d033a973f287..afbb19841d0f 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/spinlock_types.h
> > @@ -10,7 +10,24 @@
> > # error "please don't include this file directly"
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_TICKET_LOCK
> > +#define TICKET_NEXT 16
> > +
> > +typedef struct {
> > + union {
> > + u32 lock;
> > + struct __raw_tickets {
> > + /* little endian */
> > + u16 owner;
> > + u16 next;
> > + } tickets;
> > + };
> > +} arch_spinlock_t;
> > +
> > +#define __ARCH_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED { { 0 } }
> > +#else
> > #include <asm-generic/qspinlock_types.h>
> > +#endif
> > #include <asm-generic/qrwlock_types.h>
> >
> > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H */
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Guo Ren
>
> ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/



--
Best Regards
Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/