Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: fix detection of PHY on Topaz switches

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Mon Apr 12 2021 - 10:44:20 EST


On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 03:34:47PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Monday 12 April 2021 15:15:07 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +static u16 mv88e6xxx_physid_for_family(enum mv88e6xxx_family family);
> > > +
> >
> > No forward declaration please. Move the code around. It is often best
> > to do that in a patch which just moves code, no other changes. It
> > makes it easier to review.
>
> Avoiding forward declaration would mean to move about half of source
> code. mv88e6xxx_physid_for_family depends on mv88e6xxx_table which
> depends on all _ops structures which depends on all lot of other
> functions.

So this is basically what you are trying to do:

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index 903d619e08ed..ef4dbcb052b7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -3026,6 +3026,18 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
return err;
}

+static const enum mv88e6xxx_model family_model_table[] = {
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6095] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6095,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6097] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6097,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6185] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6185,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6250] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6250,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6320] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6320,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6341] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6341,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6351] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6351,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6352] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6352,
+ [MV88E6XXX_FAMILY_6390] = MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390,
+};
+
static int mv88e6xxx_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy, int reg)
{
struct mv88e6xxx_mdio_bus *mdio_bus = bus->priv;
@@ -3056,7 +3068,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int phy, int reg)
* a PHY,
*/
if (!(val & 0x3f0))
- val |= MV88E6XXX_PORT_SWITCH_ID_PROD_6390 >> 4;
+ val |= family_model_table[chip->info->family] >> 4;
}

and it compiles. No forward declarations needed. It is missing all the
error checking etc, but i don't see why that should change the
dependencies.

Andrew