Re: [PATCH 4/6] staging: rtl8192e: matched alignment with open parenthesis

[Mitali Borkar]

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:31:53PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 07:55 +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:07:09PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 07:05 +0530, Mitali Borkar wrote:
> > > > Matched the alignment with open parenthesis to meet linux kernel coding
> > > > style.
> > > > Reported by checkpatch.
> > > []
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192e/rtl819x_HTProc.c
> > > []
> > > > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ bool IsHTHalfNmodeAPs(struct rtllib_device *ieee)
> > > >  	    (net->ralink_cap_exist))
> > > >  		retValue = true;
> > > >  	else if (!memcmp(net->bssid, UNKNOWN_BORADCOM, 3) ||
> > > > -		!memcmp(net->bssid, LINKSYSWRT330_LINKSYSWRT300_BROADCOM, 3) ||
> > > > +		 !memcmp(net->bssid, LINKSYSWRT330_LINKSYSWRT300_BROADCOM, 3) ||
> > > >  		!memcmp(net->bssid, LINKSYSWRT350_LINKSYSWRT150_BROADCOM, 3) ||
> > > >  		(net->broadcom_cap_exist))
> > > 
> > > checkpatch is a stupid script.
> > > Look further at the code not just at what checkpatch reports.
> > > Align all the contination lines, not just the first one.
> > > 
> > Sir, I have aligned them in last patch of this patchset.
> 
> This sort of change should not require an additional patch.
>
So now should I compile this as a patchset of 5, removing the last patch
of alignment?
>