Re: [PATCH] i2c: I2C_HISI should depend on ARCH_HISI && ACPI

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

Hi Andy,

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 2:37 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:26:15PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > The HiSilicon Kunpeng I2C controller is only present on HiSilicon
> > Kunpeng SoCs, and its driver relies on ACPI to probe for its presence.
> > Hence add dependencies on ARCH_HISI and ACPI, to prevent asking the user
> > about this driver when configuring a kernel without Hisilicon platform
> > or ACPI firmware support.
>
> I don't by the ACPI dependency, sorry.
>
> The driver is a pure platform driver that can be enumerated on ACPI enabled
> devices, but otherwise it can be used as a platform one.

Sure, you can manually instantiate a platform device with a matching
name, and set up the "clk_rate" device property.
But would it make sense to do that? Would anyone ever do that?

The corresponding SPI_HISI_KUNPENG depends on ACPI, too.

> If you remove ACPI dependency, feel free to add my
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks! ;-)

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds