Re: [PATCH v4 04/13] dump_stack: Add vmlinux build ID to stack traces
From: Petr Mladek
Date: Tue Apr 13 2021 - 10:41:24 EST
On Fri 2021-04-09 18:52:51, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Add the running kernel's build ID[1] to the stacktrace information
> header. This makes it simpler for developers to locate the vmlinux with
> full debuginfo for a particular kernel stacktrace. Combined with
> scripts/decode_stracktrace.sh, a developer can download the correct
> vmlinux from a debuginfod[2] server and find the exact file and line
> number for the functions plus offsets in a stacktrace.
>
> This is especially useful for pstore crash debugging where the kernel
> crashes are recorded in the pstore logs and the recovery kernel is
> different or the debuginfo doesn't exist on the device due to space
> concerns (the data can be large and a security concern). The stacktrace
> can be analyzed after the crash by using the build ID to find the
> matching vmlinux and understand where in the function something went
> wrong.
>
> Example stacktrace from lkdtm:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 3255 at drivers/misc/lkdtm/bugs.c:83 lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm]
> Modules linked in: lkdtm rfcomm algif_hash algif_skcipher af_alg xt_cgroup uinput xt_MASQUERADE
> CPU: 4 PID: 3255 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.11 #3 aa23f7a1231c229de205662d5a9e0d4c580f19a1
> Hardware name: Google Lazor (rev3+) with KB Backlight (DT)
> pstate: 00400009 (nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> pc : lkdtm_WARNING+0x28/0x30 [lkdtm]
>
> The hex string aa23f7a1231c229de205662d5a9e0d4c580f19a1 is the build ID,
> following the kernel version number. Put it all behind a config option,
> STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID, so that kernel developers can remove this
> information if they decide it is too much.
>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureBuildId [1]
> Link: https://sourceware.org/elfutils/Debuginfod.html [2]
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx>
One comment below.
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +++++++++++
> lib/dump_stack.c | 13 +++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 2779c29d9981..5f883e50f406 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -35,6 +35,17 @@ config PRINTK_CALLER
> no option to enable/disable at the kernel command line parameter or
> sysfs interface.
>
> +config STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID
> + bool "Show build ID information in stacktraces"
> + depends on PRINTK
> + help
> + Selecting this option adds build ID information for symbols in
> + stacktraces printed with the printk format '%p[SR]b'.
> +
> + This option is intended for distros where debuginfo is not easily
> + accessible but can be downloaded given the build ID of the vmlinux or
> + kernel module where the function is located.
> +
> config CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL_DEFAULT
> int "Default console loglevel (1-15)"
> range 1 15
> diff --git a/lib/dump_stack.c b/lib/dump_stack.c
> index f5a33b6f773f..d685331b065f 100644
> --- a/lib/dump_stack.c
> +++ b/lib/dump_stack.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/buildid.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> @@ -36,6 +37,14 @@ void __init dump_stack_set_arch_desc(const char *fmt, ...)
> va_end(args);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID)
> +#define BUILD_ID_FMT " %20phN"
> +#define BUILD_ID_VAL vmlinux_build_id
> +#else
> +#define BUILD_ID_FMT "%s"
> +#define BUILD_ID_VAL ""
> +#endif
3rd patch always defines and initializes vmlinux_build_id. But it is
used only when CONFIG_STACKTRACE_BUILD_ID is enabled.
Is it intentional, please?
It is not a big deal for vmlinux_build_id. But it is more questionable
for the per-module id. I am going to open this question for 5th patch
as well.
Best Regards,
Petr