Re: [PATCH] sched: remove the redundant comments

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:36:07 +0200
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> > @@ -897,11 +897,6 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sched_uclamp_used);
> >  struct rq {
> >  	/* runqueue lock: */
> >  	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> > -
> > -	/*
> > -	 * nr_running and cpu_load should be in the same cacheline because
> > -	 * remote CPUs use both these fields when doing load calculation.
> > -	 */
> >  	unsigned int		nr_running;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >  	unsigned int		nr_numa_running;  
> 
> I forgot to remove this snippet back then. LGTM.
> 
> Add a
> 
>   Fixes: 55627e3cd22c ("sched/core: Remove rq->cpu_load[]")
> 
> line.

It's just removing a comment. Should it really need a "Fixes" tag, which
will cause many people to look at it to determine if it should be
backported to stable?

-- Steve