Re: [PATCH 3/7] crypto: qce: Add mode for rfc4309
From: Bjorn Andersson
Date: Tue Apr 13 2021 - 16:39:04 EST
On Tue 13 Apr 14:30 CDT 2021, Thara Gopinath wrote:
>
>
> On 4/5/21 6:32 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 25 Feb 12:27 CST 2021, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> >
> > > rf4309 is the specification that uses aes ccm algorithms with IPsec
> > > security packets. Add a submode to identify rfc4309 ccm(aes) algorithm
> > > in the crypto driver.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/crypto/qce/common.h | 7 +++++--
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h b/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h
> > > index 3bc244bcca2d..3ffe719b79e4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/common.h
> > > @@ -51,9 +51,11 @@
> > > #define QCE_MODE_CCM BIT(12)
> > > #define QCE_MODE_MASK GENMASK(12, 8)
> > > +#define QCE_MODE_CCM_RFC4309 BIT(13)
> > > +
> > > /* cipher encryption/decryption operations */
> > > -#define QCE_ENCRYPT BIT(13)
> > > -#define QCE_DECRYPT BIT(14)
> > > +#define QCE_ENCRYPT BIT(14)
> > > +#define QCE_DECRYPT BIT(15)
> >
> > Can't we move these further up, so that next time we want to add
> > something it doesn't require that we also move the ENC/DEC bits?
>
> Yes I will change it to BIT(30) and BIT(31)
>
> >
> > > #define IS_DES(flags) (flags & QCE_ALG_DES)
> > > #define IS_3DES(flags) (flags & QCE_ALG_3DES)
> > > @@ -73,6 +75,7 @@
> > > #define IS_CTR(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_CTR)
> > > #define IS_XTS(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_XTS)
> > > #define IS_CCM(mode) (mode & QCE_MODE_CCM)
> > > +#define IS_CCM_RFC4309(mode) ((mode) & QCE_MODE_CCM_RFC4309)
> >
> > While leaving room for the typical macro issues, none of the other
> > macros wrap the argument in parenthesis. Please follow the style of the
> > driver, and perhaps follow up with a cleanup patch that just wraps them
> > all in parenthesis?
>
> This does throw up a checkpatch warning if I don't wrap "mode" in
> parenthesis. How about I keep this for now and I will follow up with a clean
> up for rest of the macros later ?
>
I don't have a problem with this approach.
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > > #define IS_ENCRYPT(dir) (dir & QCE_ENCRYPT)
> > > #define IS_DECRYPT(dir) (dir & QCE_DECRYPT)
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Thara