Re: [PATCH v2, 0/5] Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to atomic_exec"

[Jassi Brar]

On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 3:51 AM Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/04/2021 17:29, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 6:18 AM Yongqiang Niu
> > <yongqiang.niu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series base linux 5.12-rc2
> >> these patches will cause home ui flick when cursor moved,
> >> there is no fix solution yet, revert these patches first.
> >>
> >> change since v1:
> >> add mtk-gce.txt and dts modification
> >>
> >> Yongqiang Niu (5):
> >>   Revert "drm/mediatek: Make sure previous message done or be aborted
> >>     before send"
> >>   Revert "mailbox: mediatek: remove implementation related to
> >>     atomic_exec"
> >>   Revert "dt-bindings: mailbox: mtk-gce: fix incorrect mbox-cells value"
> >>   Revert "arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: fix gce incorrect mbox-cells
> >>     value"
> >>   arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8183: add gce information for mmsys
> >>
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mtk-gce.txt        |  2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8183.dtsi           |  5 +-
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c            |  1 -
> >>  drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c                 | 80 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >>  4 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >>
> > Please break the patchsets (this and the other 3) into mailbox only
> > and platform specific ones.
> > Also, it would help if there are some acked/reviewed by some mtk folks
> > especially when reverting patches.
> >
>
> I'd prefer to have DT and mailbox patches together as otherwise the burden on me
> to find out which patches in the driver are needed, and to check if these got
> accepted, gets higher.
>
I meant the patches that need to go via mailbox tree (controller) and the rest.

thanks.