Re: [PATCH 2/7] stm class: Replace uuid_t with plain u8 uuid[16]

[Alexander Shishkin]

Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 10:14:34PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> >> Using raw buffer APIs against uuid_t / guid_t.
>> >
>> > So you want to do that, or you do not want to do that?  Totally
>> > confused,
>> 
>> My understanding is that:
>> 1) generate_random_uuid() use is allegedly bad even though it's in their
>> header,
>> 2) poking directly at the byte array inside uuid_t is bad, even though,
>> again, header.
>> 
>> It is, indeed, not ideal.
>> 
>> If agreeable, I'll update this patch to the below and respin the whole
>> series.
>
> You are showing that Andy wrote this, when you are the one that did :(

That's intentional, it's Andy's patch. In fact, it was probably me who
insisted on the open-coded-byte-array version, in an offline
conversation some time ago. I'd like to keep his name on it if that's
ok. I've re-sent it [1] as a standalone patch.

> Anyway, I've dropped this single patch from the series and applied the
> rest.  Feel free to send this patch as a stand-alone one once you have
> the authorship issues sorted out.

Thank you!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210415091555.88085-1-alexander.shishkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Regards,
--
Alex