Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] w1: ds2438: fixed if brackets coding style issue

[Luiz Sampaio]

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 07:40:57AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-04-09 at 00:09 -0300, Luiz Sampaio wrote:
> > Since there is only one statement inside the if clause, no brackets are
> > required.
> []
> > diff --git a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c
> []
> > @@ -287,9 +287,9 @@ static ssize_t iad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >  	if (!buf)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > 
> > -	if (w1_ds2438_get_current(sl, &voltage) == 0) {
> > +	if (w1_ds2438_get_current(sl, &voltage) == 0)
> >  		ret = snprintf(buf, count, "%i\n", voltage);
> > -	} else
> > +	else
> >  		ret = -EIO;
> >  
> > 
> >  	return ret;
> 
> to me this would look better using a style like the below:
> (and it might be better using sysfs_emit and not snprintf too)
> 
> ---
>  drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c | 36 ++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c
> index 5cfb0ae23e91..9115c5a9bc4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c
> +++ b/drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds2438.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,6 @@ static ssize_t iad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  			loff_t off, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
> -	int ret;
>  	int16_t voltage;
>  
>  	if (off != 0)
> @@ -287,12 +286,10 @@ static ssize_t iad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (w1_ds2438_get_current(sl, &voltage) == 0) {
> -		ret = snprintf(buf, count, "%i\n", voltage);
> -	} else
> -		ret = -EIO;
> +	if (w1_ds2438_get_current(sl, &voltage))
> +		return -EIO;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return snprintf(buf, count, "%i\n", voltage);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t page0_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> @@ -330,7 +327,6 @@ static ssize_t temperature_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  				loff_t off, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
> -	int ret;
>  	int16_t temp;
>  
>  	if (off != 0)
> @@ -338,12 +334,10 @@ static ssize_t temperature_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (w1_ds2438_get_temperature(sl, &temp) == 0) {
> -		ret = snprintf(buf, count, "%i\n", temp);
> -	} else
> -		ret = -EIO;
> +	if (w1_ds2438_get_temperature(sl, &temp))
> +		return -EIO;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return snprintf(buf, count, "%i\n", temp);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t vad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> @@ -351,7 +345,6 @@ static ssize_t vad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  			loff_t off, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
> -	int ret;
>  	uint16_t voltage;
>  
>  	if (off != 0)
> @@ -359,12 +352,10 @@ static ssize_t vad_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (w1_ds2438_get_voltage(sl, DS2438_ADC_INPUT_VAD, &voltage) == 0) {
> -		ret = snprintf(buf, count, "%u\n", voltage);
> -	} else
> -		ret = -EIO;
> +	if (w1_ds2438_get_voltage(sl, DS2438_ADC_INPUT_VAD, &voltage))
> +		return -EIO;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return snprintf(buf, count, "%u\n", voltage);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t vdd_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> @@ -372,7 +363,6 @@ static ssize_t vdd_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  			loff_t off, size_t count)
>  {
>  	struct w1_slave *sl = kobj_to_w1_slave(kobj);
> -	int ret;
>  	uint16_t voltage;
>  
>  	if (off != 0)
> @@ -380,12 +370,10 @@ static ssize_t vdd_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
>  	if (!buf)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	if (w1_ds2438_get_voltage(sl, DS2438_ADC_INPUT_VDD, &voltage) == 0) {
> -		ret = snprintf(buf, count, "%u\n", voltage);
> -	} else
> -		ret = -EIO;
> +	if (w1_ds2438_get_voltage(sl, DS2438_ADC_INPUT_VDD, &voltage))
> +		return -EIO;
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return snprintf(buf, count, "%u\n", voltage);
>  }
>  
>  static BIN_ATTR(iad, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR | S_IWGRP, iad_read, iad_write, 0);
>

Sorry for the late reply! I agree, this would look nicer. I will wait for
the current revision and change this for the next one.