Re: [PATCH 00/31] Rid W=1 warnings from GFS2 and EncryptFS

[Tyler Hicks]

On 2021-03-30 17:44:27, Lee Jones wrote:
> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1
> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with
> niggly little warnings.
> 
> There is more to do in filesystems.  Another set will follow.
> 
> Lee Jones (31):
...
>   fs: ecryptfs: read_write: File headers do not make good candidates for
>     kernel-doc
>   fs: ecryptfs: debug: Demote a couple of kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: dentry: File headers are not good candidates for
>     kernel-doc
>   fs: ecryptfs: kthread: Demote file header and provide description for
>     'cred'
>   fs: ecryptfs: file: Demote kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: super: Fix formatting, naming and kernel-doc abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: messaging: Add missing param descriptions and demote
>     abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: main: Demote a bunch of non-conformant kernel-doc
>     headers
>   fs: ecryptfs: miscdev: File headers are not good kernel-doc candidates
>   fs: ecryptfs: crypto: Supply some missing param descriptions and
>     demote abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: mmap: Help out one function header and demote other
>     abuses
>   fs: ecryptfs: inode: Help out nearly-there header and demote
>     non-conformant ones
>   fs: ecryptfs: keystore: Fix some kernel-doc issues and demote
>     non-conformant headers

I've applied the eCryptfs fixes to the next branch of
tyhicks/ecryptfs.git. Thanks for the clean-up!

Tyler