Re: [RESEND v2] iommu/vt-d: Use passthrough mode for the Intel IPUs

[Sakari Ailus]

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:54:57PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 05:37:27PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:55:33PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:56:40PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 06:34:26PM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > > > > On 4/20/21 6:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:48:33AM +0800, Bingbu Cao wrote:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > 
> > > > > > This misses the changelog from v1 followed by the explanation why resent.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > I noticed there was a typo in the recipient list:
> > > > > stable.vger.kernel.org -> stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > 
> > > > > no code change for resent.
> > > > 
> > > > When you're submitting a patch and want it reach the stable kernels, you'll
> > > > need to add a Cc tag:
> > > > 
> > > > 	Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > 
> > > > But not actually add the address to cc. I dropped stable@vger address from
> > > > distribution.
> > > 
> > > Does it really matter?
> > 
> > Usually aligning what you're doing with
> > Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst is not a bad idea.
> 
> True, my point is that technically both ways will give the same result, no?

If you get your patch merged this way, then yes. :-)

-- 
Sakari Ailus