Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] net: netrom: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 3/5/21 03:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
> 
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netrom/nr_route.c b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
> --- a/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> +++ b/net/netrom/nr_route.c
> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case 2:
>  		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
> +		break;
>  	case 1:
>  		break;
>  	}
> @@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
>  					fallthrough;
>  				case 1:
>  					nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
> +					break;
>  				case 2:
>  					break;
>  				}
> @@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
>  					fallthrough;
>  				case 1:
>  					s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
> +					break;
>  				case 2:
>  					break;
>  				}
> @@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
>  							fallthrough;
>  						case 1:
>  							t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
> +							break;
>  						case 2:
>  							break;
>  						}
>