RE: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings

[Gross, Mark]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 2:33 PM
> To: mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; markgross@xxxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxx;
> damien.lemoal@xxxxxxx; dragan.cvetic@xxxxxxxxxx;
> gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; corbet@xxxxxxx; palmerdabbelt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> paul.walmsley@xxxxxxxxxx; peng.fan@xxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx;
> shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx; jassisinghbrar@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Kelly, Seamus <seamus.kelly@xxxxxxxxx>;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 19/34] xlink-core: Add xlink core device tree bindings
> 
> On 2/12/21 2:22 PM, mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) # Copyright (c)
> > +Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/misc/intel,keembay-xlink.yaml#";
> > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#";
> > +
> > +title: Intel Keem Bay xlink
> 
> Is there a specific reason this is dual licensed?  If so, can you please include
> information about the license choice in the next post's cover letter?
> 
> If there is no specific reason for this contribution to be dual licensed, please make it
> GPL-2.0 only.
I will.

I'm just waiting on some testing before making the next post.

Thanks,
--mark